ZIV METERING

PRIME Evolution towards 1.4

  • In 2010 Spain starts its first deployment of PRIME 1.3.6 SmartMeters
  • The initial deployment concludes in 2018 with 15 million meters deployed

The deployment is widely successful:

100% AMI SmartMeters
remotely managed

100% Digital Secondary
Substations

More Automatization in
the Grid

Legal
Mandate

Proof of
Concept

Prototypes

Laboratory

Testing

Massive

Roll-out

End of

Roll-out

2007

2008

2010

2009

2011

2017

PRIME PLC and SmartGrids

First Deployment of PRIME 1.3.6

  • In 2025 begins the renewal of meters due to a 15-year useful life limit and new regulatory
    milestones
  • During this time there has been an evolution of the PRIME Technology to its PRIME 1.4
    version
  • This new version includes significant improvements that address previous limitations of
    the technology:
    • PHY Layer improvements
    • MAC Layer improvements
  • This new PRIME 1.4 version presents new opportunities as well as challenges and impacts
    the future deployment

Moving towards PRIME 1.4

  • Robust modes: 4 times repetition of the same signal, Preamble, header
    and payload
  • Improve against narrow band interference and impulsive noise. More
    reliable communications

PRIME 1.4 PHY Layer Evolution

Robust modes – Overview

  • Repeat the original preamble 4 times (sign inversion)
  • From 2.048ms chirp to 8.192ms
  • Preamble power increased 4dB above the payload
  • Noise rejection: Robustness
  • More precise synchronization (key for OFDM)

Preamble extension

  • Repetition block: Applies to header and payload
  • 1 symbol to 4 symbols
  • Adds temporal diversity (information is spread in time – Impulsive noise)
  • Adds frequency diversity (same information transmitted at different carrier frequencies)

Repetition block

  • There is a cyclic shift in frequency for each repetition
  • Interleaver distributes the information across all subcarriers

Repetition block

  • Robust modes added for both DBPSK and DQPSK modulations (Higher bit density)

Modulations

  • Type BC Frame: Mechanism to
    avoid collisions in a mixed
    network (1.4 and 1.3.6 devices
    using CENELEC-A Band)
  • Type B Frame: Header is
    optimized. Only one
    symbol before repetition
    (4 in 1.4 vs 2 in 1.3.6)

Type B and BC Frames

  • PRIME Alliance technical group simulations
  • Gaussian white noise, up to 4dB
  • Notched channels, up to 6dB
  • Impulsive noise, up to 14.5dB


Simulation results

  • PRIME v1.4 supports both, CENELEC A band and 7 additional channels in the frequency range<500 kHz
  • All channels are equivalent to channel 1, 96 data subcarriers
  • Channel 2 is not used in Europe


The FCC Band

Overview

  • Saturated spectrum vs Less congested. Better communications
  • Higher frequencies: Reduce noise, increase impedance and attenuation

Line parameters

  • PRIME 1.3.6
    • Control traffic to maintain the subnet is >60% of the total traffic
    • Once a switch starts switching multicast for a group it never stops
  • PRIME 1.4 fixes some of these issues:
    • Multicast switching management has been moved to the BN so only switches
      that actually have to repeat traffic repeat it
    • Time values of several concepts has been increased all through the Spec
      • Examples: Alive times, commands, promotion needs...

PRIME 1.4 MAC Layer Evolution

Traffic optimizations

  • Frame has been adapted and now have configurable larger lengths
    • 276 symbols 276, 552, 828 or 1104 symbols
    • Less CFP/BCN slot less sync points better CSMA/CA

Frame control

  • PRIME 1.3.6 has no specific mechanism to determine which modulation to use in point-to-
    point communications
  • PRIME 1.4 introduces a Robust communication management:
    • Each generic MAC PDU has RM information
      • Allows having updated information with no bandwidth loss
      • Clear information on which encoding could be used with the last received power
    • New Alive mechanism is used to manage robustness
      • Packet level RM has an issue: going from non robust to robust mode is not well
        handled
      • Alive makes sure the robustness will be increased if needed because it now includes
        a link level ACK

Robust Management

  • PRIME 1.3.6 defines security but is incomplete and not working,
    security relies on upper layers
  • PRIME 1.4 security is written from the scratch
    • AES-128-CCM for data
    • KDF AES-CMAC for key derivation
    • 2 secure profiles to choose between higher security or
      performance
    • Individual keys for traffic with each meter and a subnetwork key
      known by all nodes
    • Non secure profile is still available

Security

  • PRIME 1.4 defines a method to reference temporal events
    • A header with time offset defining an event time
    • Time relative to a specific MAC frame start, frame is synchronized with beacons
    • Frame is selected with frame sequence
    • Switches are aware of this so the information is kept up to date if needed

Synchronized events

  • Three posible scenarios:
      • Pure PRIME 1.3.6 Networks: PRIME 1.3.6
        meters are progressively replaced by 1.4
        meters in 1.3.6 mode. Once the
        replacement is completed the whole
        network is switched to PRIME 1.4
      • Hybrid PRIME 1.3.6 & PRIME 1.4 Networks:
        A new PRIME 1.4 network is deployed
        along the old 1.3.6 network
      • Pure PRIME 1.4 Networks: The old
        network is replaced at once

Starting the deployment of PRIME 1.4

Migration scenarios

  • Issues:
    • Coverage: In PRIME networks, coverage relies on service nodes (meters) acting as
      switches. Bottlenecks can occur when only one or a few nodes provide coverage to
      certain areas. If two networks are deployed simultaneously and these critical nodes are
      part of only one network, the other network may lose coverage in those areas
    • Collision: Two different communication channels are not electrically independent. When a
      node transmits a PLC signal, it lowers the network impedance across all frequencies,
      causing significant interference with other nodes transmitting at the same time, even on
      different frequency bands

  • A deployment strategy is needed:
    • Initial bulk replacement is recommended
    • Try to group meters with the same version in service connections
    • Individual meters may need to be switched to address communication issues

Hybrid migration challenges

  • Meter renewal process over the next 15 years presents both a challenge and an opportunity
    challenge for utilities

  • Utilities have already started piloting the migration towards PRIME 1.4 meters

  • The coexistence of two communication networks on a single low-voltage grid can present
    issues. While it doesn't prevent migration from one version to another over several years, it
    can impact the meter replacement strategy

  • Pilot tests have demonstrated that PRIME 1.4 offers significant improvements in robustness
    and performance

  • Pilot tests also confirm that the coexistence of both networks is feasible and manageable
    during deployment

Conclusions and pilot results

Contact us now for further information

ziv@zivautomation.com