- In 2010 Spain starts its first deployment of PRIME 1.3.6 SmartMeters
- The initial deployment concludes in 2018 with 15 million meters deployed
The deployment is widely successful:
100% AMI SmartMeters
remotely managed
100% Digital Secondary
Substations
More Automatization in
the Grid
Legal
Mandate
Proof of
Concept
Prototypes
Laboratory
Testing
Massive
Roll-out
End of
Roll-out
2007
2008
2010
2009
2011
2017
PRIME PLC and SmartGrids
First Deployment of PRIME 1.3.6
- In 2025 begins the renewal of meters due to a 15-year useful life limit and new regulatory
milestones - During this time there has been an evolution of the PRIME Technology to its PRIME 1.4
version - This new version includes significant improvements that address previous limitations of
the technology:- PHY Layer improvements
- MAC Layer improvements
- This new PRIME 1.4 version presents new opportunities as well as challenges and impacts
the future deployment
Moving towards PRIME 1.4
- Robust modes: 4 times repetition of the same signal, Preamble, header
and payload - Improve against narrow band interference and impulsive noise. More
reliable communications
PRIME 1.4 PHY Layer Evolution
Robust modes – Overview
- Repeat the original preamble 4 times (sign inversion)
- From 2.048ms chirp to 8.192ms
- Preamble power increased 4dB above the payload
- Noise rejection: Robustness
- More precise synchronization (key for OFDM)
Preamble extension
- Repetition block: Applies to header and payload
- 1 symbol to 4 symbols
- Adds temporal diversity (information is spread in time – Impulsive noise)
- Adds frequency diversity (same information transmitted at different carrier frequencies)
Repetition block
- There is a cyclic shift in frequency for each repetition
- Interleaver distributes the information across all subcarriers
Repetition block
- Robust modes added for both DBPSK and DQPSK modulations (Higher bit density)
Modulations
- Type BC Frame: Mechanism to
avoid collisions in a mixed
network (1.4 and 1.3.6 devices
using CENELEC-A Band)
- Type B Frame: Header is
optimized. Only one
symbol before repetition
(4 in 1.4 vs 2 in 1.3.6)
Type B and BC Frames
- PRIME Alliance technical group simulations
- Gaussian white noise, up to 4dB
- Notched channels, up to 6dB
- Impulsive noise, up to 14.5dB
Simulation results
- PRIME v1.4 supports both, CENELEC A band and 7 additional channels in the frequency range<500 kHz
- All channels are equivalent to channel 1, 96 data subcarriers
- Channel 2 is not used in Europe
The FCC Band
Overview
- Saturated spectrum vs Less congested. Better communications
- Higher frequencies: Reduce noise, increase impedance and attenuation
Line parameters
- PRIME 1.3.6
- Control traffic to maintain the subnet is >60% of the total traffic
- Once a switch starts switching multicast for a group it never stops
- PRIME 1.4 fixes some of these issues:
- Multicast switching management has been moved to the BN so only switches
that actually have to repeat traffic repeat it - Time values of several concepts has been increased all through the Spec
- Examples: Alive times, commands, promotion needs...
- Multicast switching management has been moved to the BN so only switches
PRIME 1.4 MAC Layer Evolution
Traffic optimizations
- Frame has been adapted and now have configurable larger lengths
- 276 symbols 276, 552, 828 or 1104 symbols
- Less CFP/BCN slot less sync points better CSMA/CA
Frame control
- PRIME 1.3.6 has no specific mechanism to determine which modulation to use in point-to-
point communications - PRIME 1.4 introduces a Robust communication management:
- Each generic MAC PDU has RM information
- Allows having updated information with no bandwidth loss
- Clear information on which encoding could be used with the last received power
- New Alive mechanism is used to manage robustness
- Packet level RM has an issue: going from non robust to robust mode is not well
handled - Alive makes sure the robustness will be increased if needed because it now includes
a link level ACK
- Packet level RM has an issue: going from non robust to robust mode is not well
- Each generic MAC PDU has RM information
Robust Management
- PRIME 1.3.6 defines security but is incomplete and not working,
security relies on upper layers - PRIME 1.4 security is written from the scratch
- AES-128-CCM for data
- KDF AES-CMAC for key derivation
- 2 secure profiles to choose between higher security or
performance - Individual keys for traffic with each meter and a subnetwork key
known by all nodes - Non secure profile is still available
Security
- PRIME 1.4 defines a method to reference temporal events
- A header with time offset defining an event time
- Time relative to a specific MAC frame start, frame is synchronized with beacons
- Frame is selected with frame sequence
- Switches are aware of this so the information is kept up to date if needed
Synchronized events
- Three posible scenarios:
- Pure PRIME 1.3.6 Networks: PRIME 1.3.6
meters are progressively replaced by 1.4
meters in 1.3.6 mode. Once the
replacement is completed the whole
network is switched to PRIME 1.4 - Hybrid PRIME 1.3.6 & PRIME 1.4 Networks:
A new PRIME 1.4 network is deployed
along the old 1.3.6 network - Pure PRIME 1.4 Networks: The old
network is replaced at once
- Pure PRIME 1.3.6 Networks: PRIME 1.3.6
Starting the deployment of PRIME 1.4
Migration scenarios
- Issues:
- Coverage: In PRIME networks, coverage relies on service nodes (meters) acting as
switches. Bottlenecks can occur when only one or a few nodes provide coverage to
certain areas. If two networks are deployed simultaneously and these critical nodes are
part of only one network, the other network may lose coverage in those areas - Collision: Two different communication channels are not electrically independent. When a
node transmits a PLC signal, it lowers the network impedance across all frequencies,
causing significant interference with other nodes transmitting at the same time, even on
different frequency bands
- Coverage: In PRIME networks, coverage relies on service nodes (meters) acting as
- A deployment strategy is needed:
- Initial bulk replacement is recommended
- Try to group meters with the same version in service connections
- Individual meters may need to be switched to address communication issues
Hybrid migration challenges
- Meter renewal process over the next 15 years presents both a challenge and an opportunity
challenge for utilities - Utilities have already started piloting the migration towards PRIME 1.4 meters
- The coexistence of two communication networks on a single low-voltage grid can present
issues. While it doesn't prevent migration from one version to another over several years, it
can impact the meter replacement strategy - Pilot tests have demonstrated that PRIME 1.4 offers significant improvements in robustness
and performance - Pilot tests also confirm that the coexistence of both networks is feasible and manageable
during deployment
Conclusions and pilot results